Skip to content

Standard

A process card as a control layer, not a specification to copy

ORPR is 74 processes in 22 areas, each with a stable identifier and a card. The STANDARD card is the default unit of the standard: it describes outcome and boundaries, data, invariants, analyst questions, red flags and regulatory bindings — within a 150–250 line budget, so an analyst and an AI agent can use it rather than rewrite it.

74
processes
22
areas
6
full cards (demo)
68
public digests
01Notation

The identifier does not change when a process moves on the map

Every process has a stable technical identifier and a navigation address. The notation is frozen since release v0.1.0 — changing it requires a new release and an explicit deprecation of the withdrawn identifier.

Technical identifier

ORPR-<KOD DOMENY>-<NN>

Example: ORPR-SAL-01

On the map the ORPR- prefix is dropped: the process appears as SAL-01.

Navigation address

<rodzaj> / <obszar> / <NN> · <od czego do czego> · <ID>

Example: flow / Catalogue and price / 02 · From pricing decision to shelf price · ORPR-CAT-02

NN is the ordinal within the area, not a process step. Execution order follows handoffs and flows, not numbers.

02Card anatomy

Seven sections, each with a single job

Section 0 is identical in every card and explains how to use it. Sections 1–6 carry the normative content. Budgets are soft — exceeding one does not block a change, but requires a one-sentence justification.

  1. 0

    How to use this card

    Fixed text. The card is an external control layer for the analyst and the AI agent. In a specification, cite identifiers (ORPR-…, Nx, Fx); do not transplant content.

    Budget: fixed

  2. 1

    Outcome and boundaries

    The end state by which the business knows the process has happened. Start, end, alternative outcomes, what the process does NOT cover (with →area/ID pointers), owner.

    Budget: 1 paragraph

  3. 2

    Data

    Mandatory inputs [D! id], conditional inputs [D: id], outputs: document, state, resulting events.

    Budget: lists

  4. 3

    Invariants

    What must always be true — testable statements without justifying prose. [N] business invariant, [K] boundary contract: observable semantics only, never a mechanism.

    Budget: 5–12

  5. 4

    Analyst questions

    Class B — blocking: no specification may be written without an answer. Class W — conditional, with an explicit "If…" trigger. Class D — diagnostic, for examining the legacy system during migration.

    Budget: 15–30

  6. 5

    Red flags

    Signals of a flawed implementation or a flawed legacy system. Each flag points to the questions that detect it. These are acceptance tests during migration.

    Budget: 5–12

  7. 6

    Regulatory bindings

    Regulatory Matrix version, legal_as_of date and a list of identifiers. Zero legal text in the card. Missing coverage = an explicit GAP in the register, never silence.

    Budget: ID list

Deviating from an invariant [N] or contract [K] is allowed without anyone’s approval, but requires an explicit entry "deviation from ORPR-<ID>/<Nx>: <reason>" flagged as a risk. A statement carrying an [R: …] binding cannot be deviated from at card level — that is a legal question.

03Claim classes

Every statement in a card says where it comes from

Source tags preserve provenance. The card in the repository carries tags and status fields (the governance layer); the agent package is derived from it by script — tags removed, normative content kept. One source of truth: the card is edited, the package is generated.

[AUT-R]
confirmed knowledge of the standard’s owner
[PROP+]
accepted editorial proposal
[LIT]
public source with a locator
[R: ID]
link to a Regulatory Matrix requirement
[HIP]
hypothesis — not to be treated as fact
[do potwierdzenia]
content awaiting confirmation
04Two card tiers

STANDARD for every process. In-depth — on demand.

The minimal-sufficiency experiment (25 Aug 2026, two model families) showed the STANDARD card is enough as a control layer — with margin. The full L1 template remains only for in-depth cards, written at an adopter’s request.

normative · default

STANDARD card

For every process on the map. ~150–250 lines of core. In the public sample: 6 full cards as a format demonstration and 68 public digests.

normative · on demand

In-depth card (L2)

Expands boundaries, inputs and outputs, variants, exceptions, the complete question bank, red flags and full mapping to Regulatory Matrix. Produced only with an adopter.

Outside the card: an extended question bank (optional), an "implementation patterns" annex (informational — mechanisms never enter the card), an APQC / ARTS / GS1 crosswalk (reference) and industry profiles (overlays, never in the core).

05Scale of content

What sits inside the 68 reviewed cards

Totals across the 68 STANDARD v2 cards after independent review. This is the scale of the control layer, not a count of "features to build".

1768
analyst questions
714
class B — blocking
560
class W — conditional
494
class D — diagnostic
741
invariants and contracts
690
red flags
2
independent reviewers
06Public content rules

Five rules that keep the standard honest

  1. 1

    The process core is sector-neutral; sector content goes into profiles.

  2. 2

    Material is produced clean-room, without client or employer data.

  3. 3

    Regulatory Matrix supports analysis but is neither a legal opinion nor a compliance certificate.

  4. 4

    The source language of the current release is Polish.

  5. 5

    Release limitations are published openly so a user can tell what is ready to use from what still needs validation.